In the meantime? The videos condemning the conspiracy theories or anti-LGBT stuff that deserves to be purged were targeted themselves for containing similar keywords. It's the platform.īOTH AND NEITHER! NEXT QUESTION. Then they make millions off of selling merch, doing speaking gigs, and getting their followers to support them on Patreon. One theory is that demonetization will end up being YouTube's enforcement middle ground for people who are too big/loud/good at line-toeing to ban completely, but are making the platform miserable for other people.Ībusers use it as proof they're being "discriminated" against. In less than 3 hours of announcing their new hate policy, YouTube appears to be already backtracking on the scope of what they intend to enforce. This, naturally, led to a complete breakdown of meaning. In the way of most half-measures, YouTube then had to awkwardly qualify and further explain its failure to serve up meaningful consequences. As Maza pointed out, this course of action may be worse than none at all - it gives Crowder oxygen for a persecution narrative while leaving him the means to continue peddling it. It was clear to any reasonable person who read Maza’s complaint and watched the content in question that Crowder’s channel is the exact sort YouTube would do well to delete in unapologetic fashion instead, moderators landed on the chickenshit compromise of ( maybe?) demonetizing it. YouTube itself was pressured into doing too little, too late, by people who have endured vile attacks from the site’s most toxic “creators.” Carlos Maza, a Vox correspondent who produces video segments on “ journalism and media in the age of Trump,” snared viral attention for a Twitter thread in which he outlined a horrifying campaign of racist and homophobic smears in videos posted by Steven Crowder, a failed standup comedian once fired from Fox News who now has nearly 4 million subscribers on the website. Because Crowder has 3 million YouTube subscribers, and enforcing their rules would get them accused on anti-conservative bias. But YouTube is never going to actually enforce its policies. This has been going on for years, and I've tried to flag this shit on several occasions. Every time one gets posted, I wake up to a wall of homophobic/racist abuse on Instagram and Twitter. These videos get millions of views on YouTube. I've been called an anchor baby, a lispy queer, a Mexican, etc. It has proven the harm of Silicon Valley’s disruption fetish, the move-fast-break-things ethos that has wrought, among other things, a Facebook riddled with disinformation and hate speech that helped Trump to the White House and a Twitter that permits rampant abuse because, allegedly, users aren’t reporting it. A company that does not know or care enough to intercept and dissolve these movements as they form has, by any reasonable metric, failed. Trouble is, they’ve been saying this on your site for years, driving harassment of the victims’ families and trapping them in a nightmare of grief without end. Sure, you’re finally getting rid of the people who say the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting (in which 26 people, mostly first-graders, died) never happened. This is, on its face, a good thing… but probably not so good as preventing these ideologies from taking root on your site in the first place. This week, YouTube - the Google-owned social platform that launched with a brief video about elephants and 14 years later stands openly complicit in the rise of right-wing extremist violence - announced plans “to remove thousands of videos and channels that advocate neo-Nazism, white supremacy and other bigoted ideologies,” per the New York Times.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |